Friday, April 8, 2022

Critical Reflection

Module Learning:

Throughout the course of this module, I felt that I was able to meet the objectives put forth. I have not perfected effective communications skills, but I have come a long way from where I started. In addition, I enhanced my ability to communicate more fluently and effectively in both spoken and written form. Unlike the bad habits I picked up in polytechnic, I was able to unlearn the wrong skills and learn the correct and proper techniques for writing papers like summary reader responses, technical reports, and transmittal letters. I believe that bad habits are the most difficult to break; it was challenging to adjust to a new way of communicating, but it was clear that the new method was much more effective in presenting my ideas to others.

Aside from what I sought to improve, I acquired new skills, such as how to effectively provide feedback to my classmates and team members so that they can improve their work. Back when I was in polytechnic, our class would often liberally leave comments to not upset or offend anyone's feelings. However, it was only now that I understood that if feedback is not given objectively and effectively, it can have a negative impact on others instead. I observed that providing constructive feedback does not always necessitate being impolite and merciless. I should still use polite language, but the content of my feedback should be truthful and beneficial. It is so that my classmates and teammates can learn from their mistakes and avoid repeating them. Being overly polite with my feedback will not assist them in the harsh working environment.

I was not expecting much when I first attended the class and was hesitant to speak up. I required more time to warm up in general and be forced out of my comfort zone. It's not that I could not speak up; it was merely that I preferred to be alone. As a result, my first trimester at the Singapore Institute of Technology ended with me having to establish only a few connections with my peers. On the other hand, Professor Brad appeared hell-bent on forcing us to communicate with the rest of the class; after all, that is what this module is all about. Despite my initial discomfort, I was actually grateful because I had formed many valuable friendships with the class.


Project Learning:

In my project assignment, I teamed with a group to prepare a technical report and present our proposal to the rest of the class. My team proposed that the airport baggage handling system be replaced with a new system named U-Lugg. However, it took some time for my team to settle on this idea. Professor Brad, thankfully, had written up schedules and outlined what to do to make things work step by step. We learned to pitch in each of our ideas in an attempt to choose the most plausible option, and this was our first obstacle.

Initially, our group was apprehensive and hesitant to share our views. We gradually warmed up and provided honest suggestions to gain a better understanding of which option was more feasible. I discovered that various individuals work in a different manner and that using a different method on different people might sometimes be more effective. As a result, I have learned to speak and approach things differently depending on who I am speaking with.

My team and I have learned that there is a correct framework for a technical report to communicate our ideas to the reader properly. I have unlearned the incorrect drafting of a technical report and adopted the proper method. To be truthful, I went back and read the technical report I wrote years ago in an attempt to get suggestions, only to be bewildered by the nonsense I had written. That is where I felt like I had made the most progress.

In terms of the presentation, it was through the mock presentation that my team and I obtained valuable input from the other teams. They offered helpful comments and suggestions for how we could improve. Since everyone's skill level varies, our group is made up of people with different levels of English proficiency. Some of us could write better, while others need more help. We learnt to help each other through this endeavour, and through helping, we also benefited ourselves.

Furthermore, my team and I worked in distinct ways. They like to work offline in person, but I prefer to work online from the comfort of my own home. To compensate, I try to be more proactive in writing and creating the PowerPoint. Due to our heavy academic burden, our group was unable to meet regularly, both offline and online. That is where we have to remind one another of our responsibilities and learn how to merge our reports into a voice, even though we are working on them individually.

I have learned a lot not only from Professor Brad but also from my teammates. This project's process was gratifying for me. Working with others enabled me to see matters from other perspectives, and we were able to gain significant experience as a result.

Ultimately, I gained a lot of knowledge from this module, but the learning does not stop here; what I learned will be beneficial throughout the duration of my studies and even when I am working. To improve myself, I will continue to enforce what I have learned and also give greater attention to written papers to increase my vocabulary.

Summary Reader Response Edited Final Draft

In the article “Astrobee Will Find Astronauts’ Lost Socks”, Ackerman (2021) described Astrobees as robots in charge of maintaining the empty Gateway. This permanent space station serves as a rest stop for astronauts travelling to the moon. The article stated that Astrobees could locate the designated position as requested, detect foreign objects blocking the way, request assistance for blockage clearance, and build a detailed “multi-sensor 3D map”. Astrobees managed to disentangle themselves from stray wires and cables, cope with communication interference, and complete all tasks with minimal help. However, NASA requires robots to manage situations that call for physical intervention. As Astrobees were not created to manipulate, it will require the assistance of Robonaut 2, who is designed to carry out many chores like an astronaut. Additionally, other robots, such as GITAI’s arm, will be involved in testing on the international space station (ISS). In hopes of having the ISS and Gateway entirely dependent on the maintenance of robots, the integrated system for autonomous and adaptive caretaking projects will be more reliant on robotic autonomy so that humans will have a base prepared in space.


NASA’s decision to include Astrobees in Gateway, the uncrewed space station, in order for Astrobees effectively takes over astronaut tasks to keep the spacecraft safe and habitable for human arrival.


To complete the tasks that were initially made to be done by humans so that the Gateway can be habitable, Astrobees are armed with practical components such as robotic arms. Astrobees have to carry out in-flight maintenance such as frequent inspection, routine maintenance, and contingency response to keep the space station usable. Marks (2019) states that the Astrobees can plug in several valuable features such as a robotic arm, a sensing system that provides continuous monitoring, or a barcode reader for inventory taking. Depending on the task assigned, Astrobees can detect the blockage of foreign objects, and also, with the robot arm, they can hold and deliver items when necessary.


Another reason why Astrobees are effective in keeping the Gateway safe for visiting astronauts is due to its multiple surveillance features. Kua et al., (2021) revealed that while Astrobees go on with their daily tasks, they can document their actions with their built-in cameras. Providing real-time updates and monitoring of the Gateway, the robots are equipped with mobile camera views to record and store the recording while providing live streaming of their activity.


Despite the Astrobees being small-sized, tasks previously done by humans can be taken over to keep Gateway ready for visitors because the robots can work independently and together as a group. Working together with other Astrobees allows them to accomplish tasks that are difficult to handle alone. Astrobee is made shaped like a cube. They are small and size 32 cm wide thus may encounter difficulty delivering too big parts. To counter that, Astrobees are made to collaborate and work with one another to get their job done. Gonzalez (2019) asserted that when the Astrobees are required to handle or transport larger objects around the ISS, Astrobees can team up and work together to manoeuvre the component. After, the robots can split up and resume their daily assignment autonomously.


However, despite the great things Astrobee can do, the robot also holds some risks. Although Astrobee is programmed to halt when an obstacle is detected, there may still be a risk of collision with the crew members or visiting astronauts. When colliding with Astrobee, there is a chance that the robot may crash onto surfaces of the spacecraft, such as the windows, causing damage to the ship. Therefore, Bualat et al., (2018) explained that they had added “corner bumpers and foam padding” to minimise the damage of this risk as much as possible.


In conclusion, Astrobee is an effective tool capable enough to maintain Gateway in replacement of the actual crew. The robots can set up the spacecraft before and after visiting astronauts. At present, Astrobees are still actively working out in space. To further revolutionise and depend on robots, Astrobee will be one of the key players.









References:

Ackerman, E. (2021). Astrobee will find astronauts’ lost socks. IEEE Spectrum. https://spectrum.ieee.org/astrobee-nasa-gateway


Bualat, M. G., Smith, T., Smith, E. E., Fong, T., & Wheeler, D. W. (2018). Astrobee: A new tool for ISS operations. In 2018 SpaceOps Conference (p. 2517). https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2018-2517


Gonzalez, C. M. (2019). NASA’s Astrobees: Future Space Assistants. Mechanical Engineering, 141(11), 12-+.

https://singaporetech.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/65SIT_INST/1qe4ih4/cdi_gale_businessinsightsgauss_A606138060


Kua, J., Loke, S. W., Arora, C., Fernando, N., & Ranaweera, C. (2021). Internet of Things in Space: A Review of Opportunities and Challenges from Satellite-Aided Computing to Digitally-Enhanced Space Living. Sensors, 21(23), 8117. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21238117


Marks, P. (2019). Robots aim to boost astronaut efficiency. Communications of the ACM, 62(12), 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365585

Critical Reflection

Module Learning: Throughout the course of this module, I felt that I was able to meet the objectives put forth. I have not perfected effec...